Saturday, 24 September 2016

A THOUGHT FOR NOW - DID DAVID CAMERON BAILED OUR OF THE PRIMIERSHIP BECAUSE OF PRINCIPLE OR EXPEDIENCY?


By resigning from politics after the debacle of Libya and Brexit, is David Cameron continuing a new trend of the West's 'cut and run' foreign policy of Blair and Bush?

So, consider this: Why did David Cameron, the former Conservative Prime Minister of Britain, suddenly gave in his notice and left his job, after a small majority of the British electorate voted for the country to leave the European Union?

And why did he subsequently decided to resigned from official politics, as his replacement, Theresa May, began to assert her authority by making it clear that the British ship of state is now under a new captian?

In the case of the first question, a credible response would be that he Mr Cameron acted out of principle and political pragmatism. That, having promised the British electorate that there would be a referendum on whether or not the U.K. remain in the European Union, and then ardently campaigned for the United Kingdom to stay in it, and dramatically losing the referendum to the Brexiteers. Mr Cameron concluded that he could not credibly remained the Prime Minister and the executioner of the 'will of the British electorate.'  Thus could his decision to resign be seen as a reasonable and prudent one.

David Cameron might be thinking, 'aah, the relief of not having to clean up or be held accountable for the monumental disasters I have engineered in Libya and Europe.'

But what about his subsequent decision to leave politics, or, more precisely, to cease to remain a Member of the British Parliament?  What could have precipitated such a decision, only a matter of days before the British Foreign Affairs Committee release a report blaming the former Prime Minister for the catastrophe which has befallen Libya and the Libyan people, following the British, European and American and Arab invasion of that country to violently depose the former regime?

Was the reason for Mr Cameron's resignation from party politics simply the result of him now wanting to live a quiet and peaceful family life - something which his Blairite foreign policy had so destructively deprived the Libyans of - and leave others to try to clean up the destruction?

Or was it that Mr Cameron really was motivated by the unlikely desire of wanting to spare the current Conservative Prime Minister any awkwardness from having to be looking over her shoulder at him, as she goes about shredding his policies and replacing them with her own

To be continued.

From causing great damage to the world to not having a care in the world, David Cameron might have said of himself.




No comments: