We can imagine that, it makes good business sense for all professions to take reasonable steps to ensure that they are able to influence the nation's education system.
So that it caters for them, by turning out students who will become suitable recruits.
Yes, as I have noted before, the education system of a society, is largely a utilitarian and functionalistic one.
It is about providing replacement workers or operatives with the knowledge, training and experience required to maintain the existing status quo.
And less about creating or generating 'free thinkers', philosophers and 'alternative lifers.'
Like it or not, it is incumbent on the majority of the people to comply with educational requirements of 'society.'
Since having a viable job, so that they/we can have or aspire to a good life.
Is probably our earnest desire, and, having 'a good education' is one of the essential means by which we can attain such a life.
In this respect, with the benefits of primarily functionalistic or utilitarian education meeting both the interests of the individual, society, and the state in general.
There is a very strong case for the state and society to bear most of the cost of, not only 'statutory education.' But also the cost of higher and further education.
Especially that which is intended to of a functionalistic and utilitarian nature. Of course, it is not clear that this is likely to happen, and, if it were to happen, to do so on the scale that is needed.
After all, probably the main weakness of functionalistic and utilitarian roles and functions in advanced societies. Is that they are roles and functions which, increasingly, can be relegated to being done by automated robots.
Which means that the necessity of educating and training humans to become like and function like robots, will decreased.
Even if, ironically, the human population is increasing, which will, ipso facto, reduce the price of labour.
And, if labour attracts a lower or decreasing price in the 'labour market', why, some will, logically, ask, should the state and society invest more in the education of the masses?
Hence the question then becomes, again, that of, what should be the nature and objectives of the education for the masses, and who should provide it, and at what price should the stakeholders pay for it?
The answer to which will influence, if not determine the answer to that question.
No comments:
Post a Comment