So, it appears that abandoning football matches in response to a few or some of the spectators verbally and otherwise abusing black players, could become a frequent occurrence.
But, is this collective punishing of the players, their clubs and the fans and watching public, the best approach towards effectively fighting this kind of expression of racism in the football business?
Is it fair that a match should have to be postponed or cancelled because of the vile and sometimes commonplace expression of racism towards black players?
After all, who looses out when a match is cancelled? Is it the racist abusers whose pleasure is frustrated?
Or is it the footballers, their teams, their fans, the watching public, the sponsors and investors in the industry?
And what lesson do those who support the abandonment of football games in response to racist behaviour from some of the people attending the matches, want to convey?
If that of 'punishing the players, the teams, the fans and the industry, for not keeping racists away from their clubs and terraces?
Why should the 'collective punishment' of the football industry and its clients, become the modus operandi of dealing with racist behaviour in the football industry.
When it is clearly not how it is dealt with in other industries. Such as education, manufacturing, mining, media, arts, etc? Why?
To be continued!
No comments:
Post a Comment