G.: And this, then, T., is where you are arguing that humans, by which I take it that you are referring to the religious scribes, the priests, the prophets and the clergy.
Are deceptively speaking as if they are speaking on behalf of 'God', on my behalf, for the purpose of this conversation; right?
T.: Yes; precisely, G.!
G.: You are saying that the religious establishment formulates the questions and the answers which will appear to validate and legitimise their religion and their 'God.'
Providing the people remain loyal in examining the religious mantra through the prism of orthodoxy?
T.: Precisely, G. All might appear well if you blindly and loyally accept 'the miracle' of the Judeo-Christian 'God.'
Like the proverbial thief in the night scenario, sneaking up on Mary in her house in the night, and seducing her.
Now, this is something which we might have expected of Greek/Roman/Scandinavian/Germanic/Egyptian/African/Mayan/Norse and other gods, whom legends and fables cited as having relationships with humans and giving birth to demi-gods.
But, for such a thing to be expected of you, G, the Judeo-Christian 'God', Jehovah; the god of gods, simply defies all logic.
No comments:
Post a Comment