Good government cannot emanate from the powerful ruling elites governing on mostly their behalf. Nor from the sections of the masses of the people practising a form of 'lynching democracy', by illegitimately overthrowing the existing government.
What are we to make of the populist protests taking place in Chile, in Argentina, in Brazil, in Bolivia, et al, and now, in Lebanon and Iraq?
Can these mass protests really be successful in anything more than, probably, causing the incumbent government or regime to capitulate; to remove themselves from power?
And, let us say they succeed in creating the momentum and dynamics to bring the current government down.
What of the legitimacy of thousands, even millions of citizens creating such a change force?
Can they claim anything more than the 'populist legitimacy' of those demonstrators and/or insurgents', and probably that of those who back them?
It certainly is not apparent or clear that they can lay any claim to any legal, constitutional, and/or moral legitimacy.
This kind of changing of the guard is certainly far from being the best method, and it can grudgingly qualify for whatever questionable valid it can lay claim to, in very exceptional cases.
To be continued!
No comments:
Post a Comment