'If we hold onto a thing or idea beyond its time, then we will prevent the birth of something more useful, more relevant.
This is a dilemma for the world's religions, as their doctrines become increasingly irrelevant and they refuse to make way for the evolution of human thought.'
Now, it is or should be clear to those of us who prefer reason and logic over 'belief' and 'religious doctrines' and superstition.
That, at best, it is very probable that none of the 'gods' of our ancestors would have been able to protect any of our ancestors from wars, famines, floods, pestilence, etc.
Even with the additional and cruel enticement of human sacrifices.
However, until they were able to develop improved weapons which could deter their challengers and enemies.
They, or some of them, placed their 'trust' in their 'gods', with the oracles purporting to intercede on their behalf.
And yet, despite the apparent, if not blatant failure of the 'gods' of our ancestors to save and protect them wars, and what might be called natural disasters.
We, the modern day descendants of our ancestors, continue to believe or profess to believe in the power of 'god' to protect us from wars, floods, diseases, and other catastrophes.
Logically, however, their is no need for having a 'god' to protect us these. So, on this count, 'god' can be seen to be irrelevant and having no value.
To be continued!
No comments:
Post a Comment