Contextual relevance.- In doing this post, I do acknowledge that that none of it is likely to apply to all women and females.
Due to demographical factors such as the females age range, peer groups, cultural, religious and social circumstances, ethnicity, nationality, relationship statuses and political and economic circumstances.
It is really has its basis in our genetic infrastructure. Women can manipulate their presentation and the impact it has on their hetero-sexual male target, but the basic ingredients are already in them and in the heterosexual man.
This is because of the evolutionary and/or survival imperative - to have children and keep the species going - which is the primary objective of the sexual interaction between women and hetero-sexual man.
Somewhat ironically, it is sometimes this 'mate-imperative' thing with women, which seemingly lead them into becoming trapped in undesirable violent and oppressive relationship with 'the wrong men or 'mate.'
With some of these women probably being 'drawn' into these relationships by what they might perceive to be the man's masculinity and dominance.
Attributes which might have been more crucial at an earlier stage in our evolution, but an excess of which can now be at a great disadvantage to the woman in a relationship with such a man.
And so it is, that the thing with some women is that they are drawn to 'the wrong men or mate.' Because they allow themselves to be guided in their choice of mate by 'their basic instinct', instead of their higher-order intellect.
This does not mean that all women, depending on whether they had the advantage of having a reasonably quality of formal education, do not have both the 'basic instinct' and the 'higher-order intellect' attribute.
It just means that some, in their choice of mate, and providing they have such a choice, as opposed to having their mate chosen for them, do made or will make a choice which will have worse outcomes than those who made the alternative choice.
To be continued!
No comments:
Post a Comment